Subject: Re: [boost] Boost licensing information
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-04-12 21:18:37
Andrey Semashev wrote:
> Also, from a cursory look, it doesn't seem to require to retain copyright
> notices and the license in redistributed source code.
It does, see "Attribution right" in clause 5. It's not even limited to
I'm not clear on "Provision of Source Code", it's not limited to the
Original Work, so it seems to apply to derived works as well. If so, this
makes the EUPL unsuitable for Boost. We don't require source availability
for derived works.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk