Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] Review of Outcome
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-30 13:19:56
>> Not to chance my arm too much, but would you be willing to change your
>> vote to yes conditional on form 1 and a second review to check that it
>> is so?
> I suppose so, but as the design seems to be evolving as well, a proper
> second review will be in order and I can't promise you a YES vote there
> (which is what YES conditional basically means).
The design hasn't changed much in truth. I just summarised it there to
Vicente a few posts ago.
But I accept you might want to see a written in stone design before
accepting. Fair enough.
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk