Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal for moving Boost to CMake
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-21 11:52:32
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Stefan Seefeld via Boost
> Sent: 17 June 2017 11:50
> To: David Sankel; boost_at_[hidden]
> Cc: Stefan Seefeld
> Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal for moving Boost to CMake
> On 17.06.2017 00:11, David Sankel wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 8:33 PM, Stefan Seefeld via Boost
> > <boost_at_[hidden] <mailto:boost_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
> > The original modularization effort called for switching to CMake, but
> > it was decided that switching to git would be a good first step. I do
> > think that my proposal is in support of that effort. I'd comment more
> > on your proposal for something else, but that seems out of scope for
> > this thread.
> Can you explain how the two are related ?
I don't think they are, much, but it was decided that changing to use two new tools at the same time would be too challenging.
I think this was a good decision.
--- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal UK LA8 8AB +44 (0) 1539 561830
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk