From: Phil Bouchard (philippeb8_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-10 04:12:25
On 07/09/2017 10:51 PM, Josh Juran via Boost wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2017, at 7:07 PM, Phil Bouchard via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Mostly I stick to boost::intrusive_ptr or equivalent in my own C++ code. However, as I developed my own high-level programming language, I discovered that having recursive closures implies having reference cycles, and I can no longer say that Iâve never written a mark-and-sweep garbage collector in anger.
Recursive closures shouldn't be a problem with root_ptr. I'll give it a
shot later this week to confirm.
>  https://www.vcode.org/
> It was essential to maintain the property of timely destruction, though, so it sounds like our respective subsystems have similar requirements.
root_ptr is instantaneous; it's not postponing the destruction of the
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk