Subject: Re: [boost] cmake target and binary name mangling
From: Steve Robbins (steve_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-27 01:50:53
On Thursday, July 27, 2017 2:06:49 AM CDT Niall Douglas via Boost wrote:
> Where are you getting the notion that end users want to not care whether
> their dependencies are in header only, or static, or shared form?
I'm a user and generally: I don't care and certainly don't want to futz around
with updating my code's build logic just because a library chose to change
from static-only to header-only.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk