Subject: Re: [boost] Microsoft vs The Boost License
From: Gottlob Frege (gottlobfrege_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-06 03:09:25
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Phil Bouchard via Boost
> On 08/05/2017 12:11 PM, Phil Bouchard via Boost wrote:
> The evidence in this case is probabilistic because what are the chances we
> come up both at the same time the exact same idea after 60 years of research
> on the subject?
It happens all the time. There is a math thesis about it - predicting
the odds of a thesis idea being simultaneously worked on independently
by someone else.
And just as the thesis would suggest, there is actually more than one
paper on the subject.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk