Subject: Re: [boost] Microsoft vs The Boost License
From: Phil Bouchard (philippeb8_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-06 14:16:47
On 08/05/2017 11:09 PM, Gottlob Frege via Boost wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Phil Bouchard via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 08/05/2017 12:11 PM, Phil Bouchard via Boost wrote:
>> The evidence in this case is probabilistic because what are the chances we
>> come up both at the same time the exact same idea after 60 years of research
>> on the subject?
> High, actually.
> It happens all the time. There is a math thesis about it - predicting
> the odds of a thesis idea being simultaneously worked on independently
> by someone else.
> And just as the thesis would suggest, there is actually more than one
> paper on the subject.
Well 1/60 * 1/60 = 0.0002778. Chances Microsoft plagiarized are simply
But it doesn't matter because their "work" is far from being production
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk