Re: [boost] [review][Fit] Review of Fit starts today : September 8 - September 17

Subject: Re: [boost] [review][Fit] Review of Fit starts today : September 8 - September 17
From: Fletcher, John P (j.p.fletcher_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-09-20 10:55:28

________________________________________
From: Boost [boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] on behalf of Barrett Adair via Boost [boost_at_[hidden]]
Sent: 20 September 2017 05:26
To: boost_at_[hidden]
Cc: Barrett Adair
Subject: Re: [boost] [review][Fit] Review of Fit starts today : September 8 - September 17

> Have not reviewed in recent times. I'm very impressed with the claimed
> compiler support, although I'm curious to know how Clang 4 and Clang 5 fare.

I have some examples which cover almost all of the library.

These compile fine with Clang 4.0.0 (C++14 and C++1z) and Clang 5.0.0 (C++14 and C++17).

The examples also compile fine with gcc 6.4 (C++14 and C++17) and gcc 7.1(C++14 and C++17)

This is on Ubuntu Linux.

I hope this helps.

John Fletcher