Subject: Re: [boost] Asciidoc, an alternative for documentation
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-06 19:17:29
On 6/6/17 7:10 AM, Edward Diener via Boost wrote:
> On 6/5/2017 11:34 PM, VinÃcius dos Santos Oliveira via Boost wrote:
> Using quickbook has always appeared easy to me. Generating html and pdf
> doc from quickbook source involves a number of steps that need to be
> correctly setup via a jamfile, and I think this is what always appears
> hard to others.
Right. I skip the Jamfile and use a simple shell script/make file.
maybe about 10 lines.
Given that asciidoc generates docbook files, it's an easy fit into boost
workflow. It's just e boostbook -> docbook step that get's skipped.
This step isn't all that essential anyway.