Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-08 19:26:01
On 10/8/17 8:41 AM, Stefan Seefeld via Boost wrote:
> On 08.10.2017 11:32, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Yeah, the documentation structure still hasn't caught up with the move
> to github.
> Each project should *individually* contain some info to indicate how to
> reach the maintainer and where to submit issues.
You mean like on the boost library incubator. it would be easy to add
pages for existing boost libraries. In fact, I might just do that on my
There used to be a
> single universal answer (trac), but quite a few libraries have moved to
> github, yet there is no normalized way to indicate that.
> (I quick and easy solution would be for each library to have its own
> "landing page" (accessible through
> out with default values. Library maintainers would take ownership of
> that document and could change those values according to their needs.)
Right, See above.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk