Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-09 13:01:38
On 10/9/2017 6:12 AM, Daniel James via Boost wrote:
> On 9 October 2017 at 03:14, James E. King, III via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> My observation in the libraries I've wandered into is that issues in trac
>> do not get a lot of attention.
>> The backlog in many projects in trac today is littered with things that
>> have valid patches but sit open literally
>> for years.
> We already have github pull requests that have sat open for years. It
> doesn't look like moving bug reports to a different platform will fix
> that particular problem.
It will make it easier for developers to see all problems in a single
place. I agree with James King that a large part of the problem is that
PRs are on Github and bug reports are on Boost trac, so the latter gets
ignored even more because of that bifurcation.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk