Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-09 16:39:40

AMDG

On 10/09/2017 05:22 AM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> 
> Regardless of one's personal preference regarding Github issues, I think
> that we all ought to agree that Github pull requests are infinitely
> better than Trac patches (were much better even without CI, now it's not
> even a contest).
> 

  To be honest, I prefer patches, because it means I have
to deal with git less.

> And yet people who are willing to submit a patch are encouraged to do so
> on Trac. This wastes either theirs or the maintainer's time.
> 
> With respect to reports not containing a patch, I also consider Github
> issues much superior, due to their integration with everything else on
> Github - you can cross-reference issues, PRs, commits, and @ people.
> 

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe