Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-09 17:17:35

AMDG

On 10/08/2017 08:00 AM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> James E. King, III wrote:
> 
>> For folks who like (potential) compiler optimization bugs:
>> https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/13247
> 
> Looking at the source of independent_bits, this jumps out at me:
> 
>    S = (S << w0) + (u & y0_mask);
> 
> and later
> 
>    S = (S << (w0 + 1)) + (u & y1_mask);
> 
> Shifts with a value more than the number of bits are undefined, and
> debugging confirms that w0 is 32 in the failing tests.
> 

Fixed in develop.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe