Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-09 17:17:35
On 10/08/2017 08:00 AM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> James E. King, III wrote:
>> For folks who like (potential) compiler optimization bugs:
> Looking at the source of independent_bits, this jumps out at me:
> S = (S << w0) + (u & y0_mask);
> and later
> S = (S << (w0 + 1)) + (u & y1_mask);
> Shifts with a value more than the number of bits are undefined, and
> debugging confirms that w0 is 32 in the failing tests.
Fixed in develop.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk