Subject: Re: [boost] Maintainers: Adding Coverity Scan to your library
From: Alexander Zaitsev (zamazan4ik_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-12 14:02:13
12.10.2017 16:17, Niall Douglas via Boost Ð¿Ð¸ÑÐµÑ:
> On 12/10/2017 14:02, James E. King, III via Boost wrote:
>> Even if you do not have travis integration in your library, running a
>> manual scan will help you improve the quality of your library, so I
>> recommend everyone at least do that much.
> I don't have positive experiences with Coverity. Nor with their tech
> If you're going to run a lint tool, the most recent clang-tidy is hard
> to beat, even compared to very expensive commercial lint tools. Plus, it
> can rewrite your code to fix the lint problem for you. Much faster and
You can use free cppcheck or PVS-Studio (free for header files).
I have good experience with these tools.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk