Subject: Re: [boost] [review] The review of Boost.DoubleEnded starts today: September 21 - September 30
From: Ion GaztaÃ±aga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-12 18:43:27
On 12/10/2017 19:17, Ion GaztaÃ±aga via Boost wrote:
> On 12/10/2017 10:37, Thorsten Ottosen via Boost wrote:
>> That means your design where capacity is the the full buffer length can
>> satisfy both situations. So I agree with you. But it also calls into
>> question the need for anything else than capacity (i.e., there seem to
>> be vanishingly little use for back_capacity/front_capacity and they
>> probably confuse more than they help).
> I agree. If capacity is the full buffer length, only back/front_capacity
> make sense.
I wanted to say only back/front_FREE-capacity makes sense if capacity is
the full buffer length.