|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [review] The review of Boost.DoubleEnded starts today: September 21 - September 30
From: Benedek Thaler (thalerbenedek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-12 20:18:12
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Thorsten Ottosen via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Den 10-10-2017 kl. 23:26 skrev Ion Gaztañaga via Boost:
>
>> On 10/10/2017 10:50, Thorsten Ottosen via Boost wrote:
>>
>
> Interesting points. Anyone willing to do some benchmark? ;-)
>>
>
> Here is one example comparing boost::vector<int> with devector<int>.
>
>
Here are my results of a similar test:
Run on (8 X 3500 MHz CPU s)
2017-10-12 22:16:02
-------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Time CPU Iterations
-------------------------------------------------------------
devector_insert/128 3837 ns 3818 ns 176825
devector_insert/512 23179 ns 23168 ns 31408
devector_insert/4096 980113 ns 978796 ns 708
devector_insert/32768 60061674 ns 59983258 ns 11
devector_insert/65536 237795405 ns 237520129 ns 3
cvector_insert/8 853 ns 855 ns 807388
cvector_insert/64 1988 ns 1989 ns 350874
cvector_insert/512 26493 ns 26494 ns 26234
cvector_insert/4096 1752987 ns 1750600 ns 399
cvector_insert/32768 108519299 ns 108385834 ns 6
cvector_insert/65536 436277805 ns 435846258 ns 2
Conditions of the measurement as posted earlier.
Thanks,
Benedek
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk