Subject: Re: [boost] [review] The review of Boost.DoubleEnded starts today: September 21 - September 30
From: Thorsten Ottosen (tottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-13 17:28:43
Den 12-10-2017 kl. 22:18 skrev Benedek Thaler via Boost:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Thorsten Ottosen via Boost <
> Here are my results of a similar test:
I'm just curious: why are the N's different for the two classes.
For example, devector has 128, but not 8 or 64?
There is one final test I would like to see. Instead of relying on
shuffled positions, we should keep the container size fixed and insert
exactly one time at each position. So instead of
for (std::size_t p : positions)
c.insert(c.begin() + p, p);
we should before the loop fill the container to 90% capacity. For
devector, make sure there is space in both ends. Then do the following:
for( std::size_t p = 0; p < c.size(); ++p )
c.insert( c.begin() + p, p );
c.erase( c.begin() + p );
That would be great to see even for small values 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, etc.
Thanks in advance
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk