Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [contract] help marking regression test expected failures
From: Joaquin M López Muñoz (joaquinlopezmunoz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-25 15:07:14


El 25/10/2017 a las 16:56, Lorenzo Caminiti via Boost escribió:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Edward Diener via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 10/25/2017 3:09 AM, Joaquin M López Muñoz via Boost wrote:
>>> El 25/10/2017 a las 1:16, Lorenzo Caminiti via Boost escribió:
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> I need some help with marking some Boost.Contract regression tests as
>>>> expected failures.
>>>>
>>>> I don't understand why my explicit-failures-markup.xml:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/boostorg/boost/blob/develop/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't math the expected failures I see on the regression report:
>>>> http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/contract.html
>>>
>>> Your changes haven been added to develop but not merged to the release
>>> version of
>>> explicit-failures-markup.xml yet.
>>
>> Why would not an explicit-failures-markup.xml for 'develop' be applied to
>> 'develop' regression testing ?
> Correct. I am only looking at develop regression testing so the fact
> that explicit-failures-markup.xml is not merged to master/release is
> not the problem.

I *think* the xml version from master is used regardless of whether the
reports corresponds
to develop or master.

Joaquín M López Muñoz


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk