Subject: Re: [boost] [contract] help marking regression test expected failures
From: Lorenzo Caminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-25 20:21:53
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Joaquin M LÃ³pez MuÃ±oz via Boost
> El 25/10/2017 a las 16:56, Lorenzo Caminiti via Boost escribiÃ³:
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Edward Diener via Boost
>> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> On 10/25/2017 3:09 AM, Joaquin M LÃ³pez MuÃ±oz via Boost wrote:
>>>> El 25/10/2017 a las 1:16, Lorenzo Caminiti via Boost escribiÃ³:
>>>>> Doesn't math the expected failures I see on the regression report:
>>>> Your changes haven been added to develop but not merged to the release
>>>> version of
>>>> explicit-failures-markup.xml yet.
>>> Why would not an explicit-failures-markup.xml for 'develop' be applied to
>>> 'develop' regression testing ?
>> Correct. I am only looking at develop regression testing so the fact
>> that explicit-failures-markup.xml is not merged to master/release is
>> not the problem.
> I *think* the xml version from master is used regardless of whether the
> reports corresponds
> to develop or master.
You are right! I just checked and the expected failures showing up on
develop regression test report match 100% the markups of
explicit-failures-markup.xml from *master* (instead of using the
markups from develop).
Who can fix this? Making sure that explicit-failures-markup.xml from
develop (not master) is used to markup the develop's regression tests.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk