Subject: Re: [boost] [contract] help marking regression test expected failures
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-25 20:26:56
On 10/25/2017 4:21 PM, Lorenzo Caminiti via Boost wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Joaquin M LÃ³pez MuÃ±oz via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> El 25/10/2017 a las 16:56, Lorenzo Caminiti via Boost escribiÃ³:
>>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Edward Diener via Boost
>>> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>> On 10/25/2017 3:09 AM, Joaquin M LÃ³pez MuÃ±oz via Boost wrote:
>>>>> El 25/10/2017 a las 1:16, Lorenzo Caminiti via Boost escribiÃ³:
>>>>>> Doesn't math the expected failures I see on the regression report:
>>>>> Your changes haven been added to develop but not merged to the release
>>>>> version of
>>>>> explicit-failures-markup.xml yet.
>>>> Why would not an explicit-failures-markup.xml for 'develop' be applied to
>>>> 'develop' regression testing ?
>>> Correct. I am only looking at develop regression testing so the fact
>>> that explicit-failures-markup.xml is not merged to master/release is
>>> not the problem.
>> I *think* the xml version from master is used regardless of whether the
>> reports corresponds
>> to develop or master.
> You are right! I just checked and the expected failures showing up on
> develop regression test report match 100% the markups of
> explicit-failures-markup.xml from *master* (instead of using the
> markups from develop).
> Who can fix this? Making sure that explicit-failures-markup.xml from
> develop (not master) is used to markup the develop's regression tests.
The more general fix is to have the 'develop' regression tests use
'develop' everywhere and have the 'master' regression tests use 'master'
> Thank you.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk