Subject: Re: [boost] A possible date for dropping c++03 support
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-08-26 13:02:01
Edward Diener wrote:
> Are you going to force it to use some C++11 on up feature in its code so
> that it no longer compiles at the C++03 level, even when it has no use for
> any C++11 on up feature anywhere in its implementation ?
He wasn't suggesting anything like that. His point is simply that if a
library is heavily depended upon, the author's decision to drop C++03
support affects all downstream libraries, which by virtue of having this
dependency will also lose C++03 support even if they themselves use no
Consequently, said author would be reluctant to break C++03 compatibility
because it would affect more than just one library.
But if we officially "drop C++03 support" he'll be freer to do so.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk