Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] A possible date for dropping c++03 support
From: Mike Dev (mike.dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-08-26 16:27:15


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost <boost-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of Paul A. Bristow via Boost
> Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2018 10:07 PM
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Peter Dimov via Boost
> > Sent: 26 August 2018 14:02
> > To: boost_at_[hidden]
> > Cc: Peter Dimov
> > Subject: Re: [boost] A possible date for dropping c++03 support
> >
> > Edward Diener wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Consequently, said author would be reluctant to break C++03 compatibility
> > because it would affect more than just one library.
>
> Do we have any idea how many real examples of this dependency there are?
>

If you mean how many c++03 libraries are used by other boost libraries that
support 03, then I'm willing to determine this number if you want(might take a
bit though). But if you have a look at the boost dependency graph you'll see
that this a actually very common case.

What I don't know is of course, how many of those libraries are maintained
by people that would like to use c++11 or later if they did not have to care
about other libraries depending on them.

Maybe this thread will shine some light on it

Best

Mike


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk