Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] A possible date for dropping c++03 support
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-08-26 16:51:33

Next message: Mateusz Loskot: "[boost] [gil] Template instantiation with GCC 8 is 50x slower than with clang++"
Previous message: Mike Dev: "Re: [boost] A possible date for dropping c++03 support"
In reply to: Mike Dev: "[boost] A possible date for dropping c++03 support"
Next in thread: Tom Kent: "Re: [boost] A possible date for dropping c++03 support"

Mike Dev wrote:

> - I'm not sure what counts as EOL for RHEL/CentOS (that might be the
> problematic one), but the way I read the matrix in
> (https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata),
> the oldest relevant distribution in 2020 (although already in
> Extended Life-cycle Support) will be RHEL 6 which only shipped with
> gcc4.4.

CentOS say in https://wiki.centos.org/Download that 6 is supported as
"Production Phase 3" which they therefore don't recommend using.

"The CentOS team recommends that you start moving workloads from CentOS
Linux 6 to CentOS Linux 7."

Next message: Mateusz Loskot: "[boost] [gil] Template instantiation with GCC 8 is 50x slower than with clang++"
Previous message: Mike Dev: "Re: [boost] A possible date for dropping c++03 support"
In reply to: Mike Dev: "[boost] A possible date for dropping c++03 support"
Next in thread: Tom Kent: "Re: [boost] A possible date for dropping c++03 support"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk