Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in Unicode library for Boost?
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-09-23 15:54:53
Zach Laine wrote:
> So, the string layer stuff is still there, but it's usefulness is now
> probably restricted to its interoperation with unencoded_rope.
Also, `string` stealing the buffer of `string_builder`, which can't be
implemented in terms of std::string.
Either way, I still think that removing push_back is taking things a bit too
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk