Subject: Re: [boost] Library devs only: Boost v2.x distro design questions
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-25 08:36:14
> I think this question is ill-formed.Â It presumes that someone (us) can
> determine what other people are going to do.Â No one has the authority
> or influence to do that.
It's a question of there being a consensus, and if not, a sufficient
What I saw there before is the usual complaints as we've seen here for a
decade now, the usual suggestions for solving it, and the usual lack of
anybody actually doing anything. Which is just pointless noise.
So I made that questionnaire to see who would publicly go on record with
where they are currently at. There is obviously no consensus, though I
note with excitement how many fewer naysayers to real change there are
compared with even three years ago. So clearly things are shifting, and
I note a number of people whose opinion has transformed radically from
where they were only recently.
That means that if somebody did roll together a tighter, smaller, more
focused Boost 2.x distribution of the better quality libraries, it might
have legs. Up to you Boost!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk