Re: out_ptr review

From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-06-27 16:25:53

czw., 27 cze 2019 o 17:56 Zach Laine via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
napisał(a):

> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 9:07 AM David Sankel via Boost <
> boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> [snip]
>
> >
> > ## Tests
> >
> [snip]
>
> > The tests are using the 'catch' library which is intended to be a
> > submodule. Is there a precedence for using a third party library like
> this?
> > For folks using Boost it could be painful to get another dependency
> > approved to run all the Boost tests. It would be preferable IMO to use
> > Boost.Test or something self contained.
> >
>
> This part is on me.  I told JeanHeyd that he must convert the tests to use
> Boost.Test, but also told him he should wait until and if out_ptr is
> accepted to Boost before doing so.
>

Or lightweight_test:
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_70_0/libs/core/doc/html/core/lightweight_test.html

Regards,
&rzej;