Re: [asio][coroutine] forbid_suspend blocks

From: Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira (vini.ipsmaker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-08-07 09:56:31

Thanks for the info. I forgot to acknowledge last time.

Em qua, 15 de ago de 2018 Ã s 23:11, Vinnie Falco via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> escreveu:

> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 5:06 AM Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > the absence of the await in P0114 is a likely source of many maintenance
> nightmares
>
> We have no idea how P0114 would play out because no one took the time
> to implement it. We only heard from the opposing counsel (Gor), and he
> only offered opinions. I spearheaded an effort to implement P0114 in
> clang and we made some progress, including necessary modifications to
> the original paper to make things smooth and also address some issues
> raised by other stakeholders. But the talent I was working with did
> not have enough time available to complete the project. One of the
> modifications was an "opt-in" model of resumable expressions, to avoid
> the problem where code unsuspectingly becomes suspended at a place
> that should not suspend (for example, while holding a mutex).
>
> High quality engineers familiar with Clang/LLVM are mostly already
> working on projects, and also employed by large corporations. The mere
> existence of Coroutines TS, plus the assumption of correctness
> conferred by the author's employer, discourages significant investment
> in alternate implementations.
>
> Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>

-- 
Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira
https://vinipsmaker.github.io/