From: Hans Dembinski (hans.dembinski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-08-21 08:12:32
> On 20. Aug 2019, at 21:40, Rene Rivera via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 2:35 PM Raffi Enficiaud via Boost <
> boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 19.08.19 17:45, Rene Rivera via Boost wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 2:57 AM Hans Dembinski via Boost <
>>> boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> It would be fantastic to see a PR for the existing library check Python
>>> program <
>>> as that would achieve the goal of providing continuous visibility on a
>>> branch and per library basis as you suggest.
>> Do you want to run inspect using this python script or do you want a
>> full implementation of inspect in python?
> We can start with the license checks. And eventually add more inspect
> functionality if needed. But the goal is not to run the inspect program
> itself preferring to "port" the functionality over.
Great, I would like to give it a shot. I am a senior Python developer.
Just running `python status/boost_check_library.py` locally gives an error instead of a helpful usage message. I will work on improving that as well.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk