From: Gavin Lambert (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-09-09 23:41:53
On 10/09/2019 09:42, Vinnie Falco wrote:
> I've been discussing this on the C++ Slack and I think a separate
> Boost library would be best. There is a growing clamor from users for
> more modularity from Boost. Having more fine-grained libraries would
> help with this.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk