|
Boost : |
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-09-13 12:43:30
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:28 AM <julien.blanc_at_tgcm.eu> wrote:
> Why not use a static_vector<char> ?
static_vector is missing all of the string-oriented algorithms.
> There is a cost associated with maintaining the null termination of strings
Yeah, that's easily fixed. We can add the function
fixed_capacity_string::c_str() which will put the terminator on and
return a pointer, this way the mutating operations do not need to
always leave the string in a null terminated state.
Thanks
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk