From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-09-13 12:46:21
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:21 AM Roberto Hinz <robhz786_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Let me illustrate why I disagree with that...
Okay, these are two fair points, but then the title of the original
post is not accurate. What you're really proposing is "a better
std::ostream" which is an entirely different conversation.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk