From: Roberto Hinz (robhz786_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-09-13 13:50:17
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:46 AM Vinnie Falco <vinnie.falco_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:21 AM Roberto Hinz <robhz786_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Let me illustrate why I disagree with that...
> Okay, these are two fair points, but then the title of the original
> post is not accurate. What you're really proposing is "a better
> std::ostream" which is an entirely different conversation.
You are right. Thanks for the comments
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk