Re: [Boost-users] Interest in a C++20 Unit Testing Framework?

From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-11-23 16:09:26

On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 16:59, Krzysztof Jusiak <krzysztof_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I wasn't even trying to imply that [Boost].UT should go to the standard (it's not even a boost library ;)
> but, as stated, I believe there are benefits of having things in the standard and I,
> personally, think that C++ would benefit from having some basic testing primitives but,
> as always there are pros and cons to literally anything.

Yes, you were not.

Since you touched on best practices as one of goals/roles of the
standardization,
I just took it as an opportunity to briefly review what the current UT
docs present
in terms of the possible best practices.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net