Boost logo

Boost :

From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-11-23 16:09:26

On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 16:59, Krzysztof Jusiak <krzysztof_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I wasn't even trying to imply that [Boost].UT should go to the standard (it's not even a boost library ;)
> but, as stated, I believe there are benefits of having things in the standard and I,
> personally, think that C++ would benefit from having some basic testing primitives but,
> as always there are pros and cons to literally anything.

Yes, you were not.

Since you touched on best practices as one of goals/roles of the
I just took it as an opportunity to briefly review what the current UT
docs present
in terms of the possible best practices.

Best regards,

Mateusz Loskot,

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at