From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-11-23 16:09:26
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 16:59, Krzysztof Jusiak <krzysztof_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I wasn't even trying to imply that [Boost].UT should go to the standard (it's not even a boost library ;)
> but, as stated, I believe there are benefits of having things in the standard and I,
> personally, think that C++ would benefit from having some basic testing primitives but,
> as always there are pros and cons to literally anything.
Yes, you were not.
Since you touched on best practices as one of goals/roles of the
I just took it as an opportunity to briefly review what the current UT
in terms of the possible best practices.
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk