Boost logo

Boost :

From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-11-25 16:32:58


On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 8:12 AM Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Accepting a library while planning to accept/review a second one to do the
> same thing is a sign of rushed design.

Glen is not proposing to accept a second library that does the same
thing. He is proposing to accept a second library that does a
different thing. There is precedent for this: Boost.Variant,
Boost.Variant2. Both exist, are different, and are used. They satisfy
different sets of users.

Regards


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk