Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-02-28 15:44:39

Next message: Vinnie Falco: "Re: Cryptography for Boost. +1!"
Previous message: degski: "Re: Cryptography for Boost. +1!"
In reply to: degski: "Re: Boost.StaticString (formerly Boost.FixedString) is ready for release!"

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 7:33 AM degski via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I would (like to ... ) have a template-SizeType-parameter
> and leave the signed- or unsigned-ness in the middle (while making sure
> things work correctly for both types (not hard)).

I don't like this at all. It is needless complexity for no benefit.
std::size_t is unsigned, get over it and move on with your life, to
focus on important things.

Thanks

Next message: Vinnie Falco: "Re: Cryptography for Boost. +1!"
Previous message: degski: "Re: Cryptography for Boost. +1!"
In reply to: degski: "Re: Boost.StaticString (formerly Boost.FixedString) is ready for release!"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk