Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Rainer Deyke (rainerd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-02-29 05:44:24

Next message: degski: "Re: Cryptography for Boost. +1!"
Previous message: Adam Getchell: "Who's using Boost"
In reply to: degski: "Re: Cryptography for Boost. +1!"
Next in thread: degski: "Re: Cryptography for Boost. +1!"
Reply: degski: "Re: Cryptography for Boost. +1!"

On 28.02.20 20:34, degski via Boost wrote:
> Oh, oh, oh, would you really consider not using OpenSSL?

OpenSSL is in fact a popular choice for category 2 cryptography,
although the heartbleed debacle has made me somewhat hesitant to use it.

-- 
Rainer Deyke (rainerd_at_[hidden])

Next message: degski: "Re: Cryptography for Boost. +1!"
Previous message: Adam Getchell: "Who's using Boost"
In reply to: degski: "Re: Cryptography for Boost. +1!"
Next in thread: degski: "Re: Cryptography for Boost. +1!"
Reply: degski: "Re: Cryptography for Boost. +1!"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk