Re: boost [math] excessive warnings via [lexical_cast] from [date_time] (and others) for clang 3.4?

From: John Maddock (jz.maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-03-24 19:18:57

On 24/03/2020 19:06, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Jeff Garland wrote:
>
>> The suppression macro would need to go into the header, but it 
>> wouldn't solve the issue for a lexical_cast user.
>
> The issue for the lexical_cast user is that his code will break when 
> Math drops C++03 support, and the whole point of the message is to 
> communicate this.
>
> The message is supposed to be verbose and annoying, because otherwise 
> nobody will pay any attention to it. Sure, the user has no immediate 
> recourse; he can only apply pressure on the lexical_cast maintainers 
> to deal with it somehow. But again, if there's no message, nobody will 
> care.

Haha, yes, that's basically why I made it so... annoying.

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus