From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-03-24 19:06:19
Jeff Garland wrote:
> The suppression macro would need to go into the header, but it wouldn't
> solve the issue for a lexical_cast user.
The issue for the lexical_cast user is that his code will break when Math
drops C++03 support, and the whole point of the message is to communicate
The message is supposed to be verbose and annoying, because otherwise nobody
will pay any attention to it. Sure, the user has no immediate recourse; he
can only apply pressure on the lexical_cast maintainers to deal with it
somehow. But again, if there's no message, nobody will care.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk