Re: boost [math] excessive warnings via [lexical_cast] from [date_time] (and others) for clang 3.4?

From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-03-24 23:16:28

clang-10 just got released, so soon, was really soon.

degski

On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 13:00, Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> degski wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 12:18, Peter Dimov via Boost
> > <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > > Mike wrote:
> > >
> > > > As degski mentioned, I doubt clang 3.4 was a particularly popular
> > > > compiler to begin with, so the answer is probably no.
> > >
> > > Clang 3.4 was the default Clang on Ubuntu Trusty.
> >
> > And then there was Xenial and there after Bionic, and judging from the
> > past release dates soon a new LTS release. In the meanwhile IBM acquired
> > RedHat (and Fedora and CentOS) ...
>
> Sure, I'm not saying it's relevant. But if you consider g++ 4.8 popular
> because it was default on Trusty, you can't consider Clang 3.4 not-popular
> because it was, too.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>

-- 
@systemdeg
"We value your privacy, click here!" Sod off! - degski
"Anyone who believes that exponential growth can go on forever in a finite
world is either a madman or an economist" - Kenneth E. Boulding
"Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell" - Edward
P. Abbey