Re: boost [math] excessive warnings via [lexical_cast] from [date_time] (and others) for clang 3.4?

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-03-24 19:00:01

degski wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 12:18, Peter Dimov via Boost 
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Mike wrote:
> >
> > > As degski mentioned, I doubt clang 3.4 was a particularly popular 
> > > compiler to begin with, so the answer is probably no.
> >
> > Clang 3.4 was the default Clang on Ubuntu Trusty.
>
> And then there was Xenial and there after Bionic, and judging from the 
> past release dates soon a new LTS release. In the meanwhile IBM acquired 
> RedHat (and Fedora and CentOS) ...

Sure, I'm not saying it's relevant. But if you consider g++ 4.8 popular 
because it was default on Trusty, you can't consider Clang 3.4 not-popular 
because it was, too.