|
Boost : |
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-04-03 20:05:00
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 20:41, Jeff Garland via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I didn't read all the original discussion, but I'll point out that there's
> more than one c++ library that has at least attempted (we can argue the
> level of success) to provide the generalized sort of interface people are
> asking for. There's some significant thinking and effort that went into
> that. Have a look at soci
FYI, I mentioned SOCI in
https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2020/03/248307.php
> -- not saying it's perfect, best or right --
> just that I've used it in production systems and even written a backend for
> it to a database that isn't supported out of the box. They worked out all
> the issues for binding custom types like date_time, etc...
Another, thin, approach to binding some types can be found in
https://github.com/nanodbc/nanodbc
Best regards,
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk