From: Christian Mazakas (christian.mazakas_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-08-25 23:58:48
> 5. Removing this from Boost.Text, keeping just the UTFn conversion
> code and anything else that doesn't depend on the problematic data files
> (as I advocated in my review).
I think this would be to the ultimate detriment of the library. Anything
Boost.Text can do for the user is a boon in this regard and only increases
the quality of the lib.
> 1. A run-time dependency on libicu, getting libicu to do all the
> work, as Boost.Locale does.
I think this would be the best path forward. Obtaining a dynamic version
of libicu is relatively straight-forward on all systems and would dodge the
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk