|
Boost : |
From: pbristow_at_[hidden]
Date: 2020-12-31 17:50:22
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost <boost-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of Hadriel Kaplan via Boost
> Sent: 31 December 2020 16:15
> To: Boost mailing list <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Cc: Hadriel Kaplan <hadrielk_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: Re: [boost] C++11 on up Boost libraries
>
> Wow, I have never seen that matrix before - thatâs really useful - thanks for the link!
>
> Honestly, a link to that should be prominently displayed on the top boost.org page. I see it now in the
> development->testing, but thatâs kinda buried - especially since most users arenât looking to develop
> for boost itself.
Indeed - it is quite well hidden and Google struggles to find it without exactly the right question â¹
I have the develop version bookmarked ð and that meets my needs.
But I haven't found the equivalent for each Boost *release*. Since this contains the most detailed test results for each release, should we be keeping a copy of the regression report for master at the time of each release.
Or have I not found these records yet?
I believe that we should point users to these tables in the context of cxxstd support.
Paul
PS I note that the current https://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/developer/index.html
Contains a reference to SVN health, but we have been using Git for some time now.
Also the user summary link
https://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/user/index.html
is not working at present
"Error extracting file: Error code 11 - No matching files were found."
This summary is probably a more useful link - but saving for each release would be good.
Should I raise a GitHub issue for this?
> > On Dec 31, 2020, at 5:19 AM, Paul A Bristow via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > but I believe that we should also encourage would-be users to consult the regression matrix
> >
> > https://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/developer/summary.html
> <https://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/developer/summary.html>
> >
> > for more detailed info on what is known to work with some confidence based on tests,
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk