Boost logo

Boost :

From: pbristow_at_[hidden]
Date: 2020-12-31 17:50:22

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost <boost-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of Hadriel Kaplan via Boost
> Sent: 31 December 2020 16:15
> To: Boost mailing list <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Cc: Hadriel Kaplan <hadrielk_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: Re: [boost] C++11 on up Boost libraries
> Wow, I have never seen that matrix before - that’s really useful - thanks for the link!
> Honestly, a link to that should be prominently displayed on the top page. I see it now in the
> development->testing, but that’s kinda buried - especially since most users aren’t looking to develop
> for boost itself.

Indeed - it is quite well hidden and Google struggles to find it without exactly the right question ☹

I have the develop version bookmarked 😊 and that meets my needs.

But I haven't found the equivalent for each Boost *release*. Since this contains the most detailed test results for each release, should we be keeping a copy of the regression report for master at the time of each release.

Or have I not found these records yet?

I believe that we should point users to these tables in the context of cxxstd support.


PS I note that the current

Contains a reference to SVN health, but we have been using Git for some time now.

Also the user summary link

is not working at present

"Error extracting file: Error code 11 - No matching files were found."

This summary is probably a more useful link - but saving for each release would be good.

Should I raise a GitHub issue for this?

> > On Dec 31, 2020, at 5:19 AM, Paul A Bristow via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > but I believe that we should also encourage would-be users to consult the regression matrix
> >
> >
> <>
> >
> > for more detailed info on what is known to work with some confidence based on tests,
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at