From: Alexander Grund (alexander.grund_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-01-07 08:10:42
>> Looking at this, I think that we need to drop the "Standard" part.
>> It's mostly empty, the places it says things like "TR1" aren't
>> helpful, and it's easy to misinterpret it as the minimum required C++
> I fully agree. Also the top line which give different views of the
> library documentation can probably drop the "Standard Proposals" and
> "TR1 libraries" views, since these are really obsolete by now.
Woops, also just seen that the text is to long. I see e.g. "C++ standard
minimum lev11". Maybe just "Minimum C++ standard"? Or even "Min. C++
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk