Boost logo

Boost :

From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-01-06 23:15:50

On 1/6/2021 5:44 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Donovan Dikaio wrote:
>> The updates to show "C++ standard minimum level" is just live here:
> Looking at this, I think that we need to drop the "Standard" part. It's
> mostly empty, the places it says things like "TR1" aren't helpful, and
> it's easy to misinterpret it as the minimum required C++ level.

I fully agree. Also the top line which give different views of the
library documentation can probably drop the "Standard Proposals" and
"TR1 libraries" views, since these are really obsolete by now.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at