|
Boost : |
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-03-27 06:18:47
Here is my review of lambda2:
I remember when I first learned boost::bind, and realized how much more
useful STL is because of it. Even after C++11 I still find myself using
bind, it sometimes looks more readable to my eyes than a lambda.
The lambda2 library is one more proof for the solid design behind
std::bind. That, or std::bind was designed with things like lambda2 in
mind. Either way, lambda2 is an elegant utility for writing elegant C++,
albeit only in the (rare?) cases when it is a perfect fit. Given this, and
the miniature size of the library, my vote is to ACCEPT.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk