Re: FFT proposal for gsoc 2021

From: Christopher Kormanyos (e_float_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-03-30 19:59:29

> Hey,
> Thanks for suggestions, I'll go through> formats you suggested, and get> back to you with more questions

Hello Gagandeep,

Thank you for your interest. This particularthread, however, was, in my opinion,dedicated to a specific query fromanother candidate. General informationI consider to be OK.
If you have a different case (and I am notentirely sure of that...)
then I would, indeed, please request youto start your own specific thread ifyou wish to pursue this project.
Kind regards, Christopher Kormanyos
    On Tuesday, March 30, 2021, 9:25:05 PM GMT+2, Gagandeep Bhatia via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:  
 
 Hey,
Thanks for suggestions, I'll go through formats you suggested, and get
back to you with more questions

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021, 12:31 AM Christopher Kormanyos via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>Â  > I've written and uploaded a first draft> proposal to GSOC-2021 for the
> Boost.Math.FFT> library.
>
> Hello Eduardo,
> Thank you for pursuing this project and preparingyour powerful proposal.
> The proposal contentits technical description, motivation and your
> personaldetails are very nicely and coherently presented.
> These make your proposal already strong.
> As has been mentioned, a reduced scope ofthe project might be more
> realistic. And itseems like there is, in fact, strong interestin the
> interface.
> Stefan mentions
>Â  > focus on an API that can be implemented as a
> > wrapper around FFTW
> There is a lot of wisdom in this advice.In fact, I encourage you also to
> look closely at ourwork with Boost.Multiprecision, one of my ownprojects
> co-authored John. There you will findthat we provide both our own
> Boost-licensedmultiple-precision types as well as wrappedversoins of GMP
> and MPFR. So in some sense,we have been living this advice for the past
> 10years and it has been successful.
> I will comment again on your proposal in moredepth. Feel free to refine it
> any way you like.You might have to place it into the GSoC onlineformat, as
> I am not sure if a manually-writtenLaTeX proposal can be used in a
> standalone form.But I'd have to check on that.
> Again, as mentioned and still the case,*I strongly encourage you to
> continue* with theapplication process.
> Kind regards, Chris
>
>Â  Â  On Tuesday, March 30, 2021, 12:59:05 PM GMT+2, Eduardo Quintana via
> Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>Â  I've written and uploaded a first draft proposal to GSOC-2021 for the
> Boost.Math.FFT library.
> https://github.com/Lagrang3/gsoc-2021/releases/download/v1.0/gsoc.pdf
> I realize now that maybe I should have given more details about the
> proposal itself,
> like user's interface and implementation ideas.
> That can be fixed in version 2.0.
>
> Best regards,
> Eduardo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost