Re: [lambda2] Andrzej's review

From: Alexander Grund (alexander.grund_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-03-31 12:45:05

> So yes, I think the only realistic way forward given the lookup issue is for
> Lambda2 to define its own placeholders in the same namespace as the
> operators.
Then you likely need to wrap the bind-expressions too, don't you?
E.g. when `_1 + 1` works by using lamda2::_1, then you'll have the same 
issue for `(_1 + 1) + 1`