Re: boost.spawn: review requested

From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-11-28 19:49:17

On 11/28/21 9:30 AM, Oliver Kowalke via Boost wrote:
> Am So., 28. Nov. 2021 um 18:18 Uhr schrieb Andrey Semashev via Boost <
> boost_at_[hidden]>:
> 
>> And if this library is not useful outside Boost.ASIO and
>> Chris is not interested, I just don't see the point.
>>
> 
> another point:
> boost.asio still uses boost.coroutine which is deprecated and I really want
> to remove it from boost
> but is not possible because of boost::asio::spawn()
> boost.spawn is the alternative to asio's spawn() (which could be removed
> from boost.asio in favour of boost.spawn)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> 

Couldn't one achieve the desired effect by just updating the 
implementation of boost.coroutine with the implementation of boost.spawn?

Robert Ramey