R: Review of mustache starts today.

From: jepessen_at_[hidden]
Date: 2023-02-05 21:45:56

Hi to everyone.
Sorry, I'm a lurker of the mailing list and I almost never reply, but I've a
question.

Mustache is a library that needs at least C++11, while in another thread
(Dropping C++03 support again) you're talking about dropping the support for
C++03. But it means that now it's supported, so this library does not
satisfy the requirement to be usable by C++03 compilers.
What do you do in this case? The C++03 support is needed only for existing
libraries or also for new ones? I'm asking because I've some idea for
libraries and I'd like to propose one of them someday, but I need to know if
they can satisfy the compiler requirements (I usually work only with modern
compilers).

What do you do with compiler support in this case?

Daniele Lupo

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Boost <boost-bounces_at_[hidden]> Per conto di Klemens Morgenstern
via Boost
Inviato: domenica 5 febbraio 2023 04:56
A: boost_at_[hidden]
Cc: Klemens Morgenstern <klemensdavidmorgenstern_at_[hidden]>
Oggetto: [boost] Review of mustache starts today.

The formal review of the mustache starts today, Sunday the 5th, and ends
next week on Tuesday the 14th.

The library was developed & submitted by Peter Dimov.

Boost.Mustache is an implementation of Mustache templates in C++11.

The master branch is frozen during the review and can be found here
https://github.com/pdimov/mustache

The current documentation can be found here:
https://pdimov.github.io/mustache/doc/html/mustache.html

Boost.Mustache is an implementation of Mustache templates in C++11.

The documentation of Mustache templates is here: https://mustache.github.io/

Review
========

Please explicitly state that you either *accept* or *reject* the inclusion
of this library into boost.
The accept can be conditional.

Also please indicate the time & effort spent on the evaluation and give the
reasons for your decision.

The review is open to anyone who is prepared to put in the work of
evaluating and reviewing the library. Prior experience in contributing to
Boost reviews is not a requirement.

Some questions to consider:

 - Does this library bring real benefit to C++ developers for real world
use-case?
 - Do you have an application for this library?
 - Does the API match with current best practices?
 - Is the documentation helpful and clear?
 - Did you try to use it? What problems or surprises did you encounter?
 - What is your evaluation of the implementation?

More information about the Boost Formal Review Process can be found
at: http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html

Reviews can also be submitted directly to me.

Thank you Peter for submitting yet another boost library & thanks for all
the reviews in advance.

Building boost.mustache
=======================

Here's how to build the library, starting from scratch:

1. Clone Boost from Github:

git clone --recurse-submodules https://github.com/boostorg/boost

2. Clone the Mustache library into the Boost tree:

cd boost/libs
git clone https://github.com/pdimov/mustache
cd ..

3. Build b2:

./bootstrap.sh

(We assume Linux and g++ from now on. On Windows,
it's just `booststrap`.)

4. Generate the header links in the boost/ directory:

./b2 headers

5. Build the Mustache library and its dependencies (e.g. JSON):

./b2 --with-mustache

This will place the compiled libraries into the stage/lib
directory. It should contain libboost_container.a/.so,
libboost_json.a/.so, and liboost_mustache.a/.so.

You can now build and run the Mustache examples by using e.g.

g++ libs/mustache/example/html.cpp -o html -I . -L stage/lib
-lboost_mustache -lboost_json

./html

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost